-
Recent posts
- Attorneys at Law Borenius celebrates its 15th anniversary
- Borenius advised AS Forum Cinemas in a sale and leaseback transaction of Coca-Cola Plaza
- Attorneys at law Borenius contributed to the research of Doing Business 2013 report
- Mobile Apps and Privacy – New U.S. Initiatives
- Attorneys at law Borenius Ltd opens an office in St. Petersburg, Russia
Archive
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- January 2007



Transfer of procurement contract on transfer of enterprise
Transfer of an enterprise means transfer of related things, rights and obligations – including contracts – in the service of the management. As a general rule, transfer of a contract on transfer of an enterprise does not require consent of the other party to the contract.
The Public Procurements Act (PPA) does not separately regulate transfer of procurement contracts on transfer of an enterprise. However, none of the above should be taken to mean that procurement contracts always automatically transfer to the new owner of a business in the case of transfer of an enterprise. The PPA provides thorough regulation of implementing the procurement procedure and signing the procurement contract in keeping with the general objectives of implementing public procurement, namely to ensure transparent, expedient and sustainable use of the contracting authority’s funds, equal treatment of persons, and effective use of the existing competitive situation for the purposes of public procurement. Consequently, transfer of an enterprise cannot create a situation where a procurement contract is performed by a person who would not have qualified for the procurement or in respect of whom grounds might exist for exclusion from the procurement procedure.
On the other hand, it should be taken into account that upon transfer of an enterprise as a whole, the transferee also acquires everything related to performance of the procurement contract, such as competences and tools. This means that the same business will continue to carry out the procurement contract but that the owner of the business has changed. If the transferee of the enterprise meets the criteria applicable to the procurement, any restriction on transfer of the procurement contract could in that situation be construed as a restriction on the freedom to conduct business.
In practice, several contracting authorities have set consent of the contracting authority as a condition precedent to transfer of a procurement contract. Giving such a contract requires that the business as a whole is transferred and that the transferee meets the criteria applicable to the procurement. Therefore, where an enterprise is acquired by a person regarding whom grounds exist for exclusion from the procurement procedure (e.g., information on a current penalty is in the penalty register in respect of the transferee or their legal representative for offences or wrongful acts which form a basis for exclusion), the contracting authority may refuse consent to transfer of the procurement contract although the enterprise and everything related to performance of the procurement contract are transferred in their entirety.
This position has also been supported by the Ministry of Finance, which supervises public procurement and gives related advice. The Ministry of Finance has expressed the standpoint that although under the spirit of the PPA a separate transfer of procurement contracts is permissible, procurement contracts cannot be assumed via transfer of an enterprise without prior consent of the contracting authority and unless the scope of the transfer has been assessed. This means that transfer of a procurement contract on transfer of an enterprise does indeed require the consent of the contracting authority, which is given subject to the transferee meeting the criteria applicable to the procurement.
At the same time, it must be taken into account that there is no Supreme Court case-law on transfer of procurement contracts, and a restrictive interpretation — i.e., that transfer of procurement contracts on transfer of enterprises is contrary to the general principles of implementing public procurement — cannot be entirely ruled out.