-
Recent posts
- Attorneys at Law Borenius celebrates its 15th anniversary
- Borenius advised AS Forum Cinemas in a sale and leaseback transaction of Coca-Cola Plaza
- Attorneys at law Borenius contributed to the research of Doing Business 2013 report
- Mobile Apps and Privacy – New U.S. Initiatives
- Attorneys at law Borenius Ltd opens an office in St. Petersburg, Russia
Archive
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- January 2007



Partner Marti Hääl gives an overview of Estonian Tax system in Corporate INTL magazine
Estonian tax system is relatively simple, transparent and business-friendly. The general tax burden remains slightly below the European average. The country’s unique corporate tax system allows all undistributed corporate profits to be tax-exempt. Consequently, the majority of business income is not distributed but rather reinvested. The overall trend in public policy is from indirect to direct taxation in all aspects.
According to the Estonian corporate income tax system, effective from 1 January 2000, the moment of taxation of corporate income is postponed until the distribution of the profits. As a result, the system fosters investments and encourages companies not to “decrease” their annual profits. The system applies to Estonian resident companies and also permanent establishments of non-resident entities.
Permanent establishment in Estonia has received a broader definition as from 1 January 2011. Before that, the permanent establishment was defined as a place through which a non-resident person engages fully or partially its non-temporarily economic activities in Estonia. Now, the permanent establishment is formed as a result of geographically specified or mobile business activity in Estonia, or as a result of a business activity of a representative authorised to conclude contracts in the name of a non-resident in Estonia. Therefore, there is no need for a “place” as such, only an ongoing economic activity in Estonia is necessary.
Another significant change in the Estonian tax legislation refers to “related parties”. As of 1 January 2011, the concept has been materially expanded. Previously, persons had to be connected by an ownership to be considered as related. According to the amendment, persons are deemed to be associated if they share a common economic interest or if one person has a dominant influence over the other (subjective judgment). This in return means stricter regulations for minimising the use of transfer pricing schemes.
Furthermore, Estonian tax authorities have recently increased the number of transfer pricing audits with special attention to cross-border transactions. The new and more general definition of related parties has a direct impact on the applicability of the transfer pricing rules and transfer pricing documentation requirements. Attorneys at Law Borenius is able to assist its clients to determine whether their business structure conforms to the new regulation and identify possible transfer pricing risks.
“A synergy of those three elements and ability to transform today’s tax disputes to a refined tax advice for the future brings added value to our clients,” concluded managing partner Marti Hääl.